Informational Interview #2

Assignment #4 forced us into group collaboration, which was pretty useful yes, but it also taught you about people. We first had to create criteria for what makes a group member effective. This was pretty hard because it required us to actually talk about expectations. 

Creating the five criteria made me reflect on what I value in team settings like communication, follow-through, respect for deadlines, participation, and deadlines once again. Writing these out showed how ENG 390 focuses on clearness in communication. A group can’t function without shared ideas and expectations.

Sharing our individual interview reports was actually really interesting. Everyone talked to different professionals, so we began seeing patterns across industries. That’s when I realized what the assignment was really about, it was about recognizing workplace communication trends. Across all the interviews, clarity, and tone appeared again and again as essential skills.

The collaborative summary required negotiation. We had to decide on structure, writing responsibilities, and agree on tone. This was a step away from an academic assignment and closer to workplace teamwork.

where we evaluated each other based on our criteria, made the entire experience feel more professional. Accountability is part of real workplace collaboration, and this assignment showed that in a realistic way.

Overall, this assignment taught me that group writing requires flexibility and patience. Even when everyone is trying, different writing styles and schedules can complicate things, but with clear communication and expectations, the process becomes manageable and productive.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Final Project Reflection

Writing The Formal Proposal

Beginning The Research Plan